CMOS‑SB

Governance Suite

The constitutional charter, governance architecture, and institutional framework of CMOS-SB. Founding Document FD-001 v1.0, ratified July 26, 2026.

Source: CMOS-SB Founding Document (FD-001) v1.0 — Ratified July 26, 2026 | Issued by the CMOS-SB Standards Committee | Next scheduled review: July 26, 2027. The founding Governance Spine V1.0 standards were posted for public review on June 9, 2026.

Global Expertise Framework

The formal declaration of the expertise domains and geographic representation required for CMOS-SB Standards Board membership — five core domains, 15 board members, global representation across six world regions.

View Framework →

Founding Document

FD-001 v1.0 — Constitutional Charter, Mission, Governance Architecture, and Institutional Framework

Preamble

The Cognitive Mode Operating System Standards Board (CMOS-SB) is established in recognition of a fundamental governance gap in the digital age. AI systems and digital platforms now interact with, influence, and shape human emotional states, cognitive modes, and population-level psychological conditions at a scale and speed without precedent in human history. These interactions occur inside every major sector of human organization — healthcare, finance, enterprise, education, government, and public infrastructure — yet no standardized governance architecture has existed to define what responsible behavior at this interface requires. CMOS-SB is founded to close that gap with a complete, auditable, science-grounded governance architecture: a Governance Spine of five published standards, an operational doctrine (CMP-HC) that translates standards into practical controls, a certification framework organizations can implement and regulators can reference, and a continuous improvement architecture anchored in scientific evidence and public accountability. This Founding Document constitutes the constitutional charter of CMOS-SB. It establishes the organization's mission, vision, scientific foundations, governance architecture, standards development process, ethical commitments, and institutional identity. It is binding on all CMOS-SB bodies, committees, officers, and affiliates.

About the Founder and Architect

CMOS-SB was founded and architecturally designed by Isabelle Anne Thompson, Founder and Principal of Sugar Sands Publishing LLC (SSP) and Founder of Sugar Sands Philanthropies Inc (SSPhi), Pensacola, FL. Thompson is the architect of the complete CMOS-SB ecosystem — including Emotional Epidemiology, the S-R-C Model, Cognitive Mode OS Theory, CMP-HC, and Joy Tracker — and serves as originating Standards Architect and Founder. ORCID: 0009-0002-7213-3235 | DOI Reference: 10.5281/zenodo.20314466

Article I — Name, Identity, and Establishment

§ 1.1 Name. The full legal name of this organization is the Cognitive Mode Operating System Standards Board, abbreviated as CMOS-SB. § 1.2 Nature. CMOS-SB is an independent, public-interest standards body. It is not a regulatory agency, enforcement authority, or commercial entity. All standards developed and published by CMOS-SB are voluntary governance instruments, intended to serve as authoritative reference frameworks for responsible design, deployment, and operation of digital systems at the Human-Machine Layer. § 1.3 Hosting Arrangement. CMOS-SB is administratively hosted by Sugar Sands Publishing LLC, Pensacola, Florida. Hosting is administrative in nature only. CMOS-SB retains full and exclusive governance authority over all standards, publications, certifications, and institutional decisions. The hosting arrangement does not create commercial ownership, editorial control, or governance influence on the part of the hosting entity. § 1.4 Intellectual Property. Cognitive Mode OS™ is a trademark of Isabelle Anne Thompson / Sugar Sands Publishing LLC. All CMOS-SB standards and associated intellectual property are owned by CMOS-SB. Non-commercial reproduction with full attribution is permitted. Commercial use requires written authorization from CMOS-SB. § 1.5 Founding Date. CMOS-SB is hereby established on July 26, 2026, in Pensacola, Florida, United States of America.

Article II — Mission and Vision (Inviolable Core)

§ 2.1 Mission Statement. To establish, maintain, and advance an independent, science-grounded, publicly accountable governance framework for the Human-Machine Layer — the interface domain at which digital systems interact with, influence, and shape human emotional states and cognitive function — ensuring that such interactions are safe, transparent, consent-respecting, and equitable. This mission is permanent and may not be narrowed or reinterpreted in ways that subordinate human wellbeing to any other objective. § 2.2 Vision. A world in which AI systems and digital platforms operate with the same accountability to human wellbeing as any critical infrastructure system — where emotional and cognitive safety are non-negotiable design requirements, not optional considerations. § 2.3 The Public Interest Obligation. CMOS-SB exists to serve the public. No commercial, institutional, or political interest shall override the public interest mandate of this organization. All major standards shall be subject to a mandatory minimum sixty (60)-day public comment period before adoption, ensuring that the communities affected by these standards have meaningful opportunity to participate in their development.

Article III — Scientific Foundations (Inviolable Core)

§ 3.1 Emotional Epidemiology. CMOS-SB standards are grounded in Emotional Epidemiology — the scientific discipline developed by Isabelle Anne Thompson (ORCID: 0009-0002-7213-3235; DOI: [[10.5281/zenodo.20314466|https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20314465]]) that studies how emotional states propagate through populations in measurable, predictable ways analogous to biological contagion dynamics. Under this framework, emotional states are understood as population-level phenomena governed by susceptibility factors, transmission rates, and collective resilience — all of which are measurable, modelable, and amenable to governance intervention. § 3.2 The S-R-C Model. The theoretical engine of CMOS-SB standards development is the S-R-C Model, comprising three interdependent variables: • Susceptibility (S) — The degree of vulnerability of an individual or population to emotional influence or manipulation by digital systems. • Transmission Rate (R) — The speed and intensity at which emotional states are propagated through a system or network. • Collective Resilience (C) — The dampening force within a population or system that reduces both S and R over time. System stability or volatility is determined by the interaction of these three variables. CMOS-SB standards are designed to minimize S, reduce R, and maximize C across all regulated system interactions. § 3.3 Cognitive Mode OS Theory. Human cognition operates in classifiable, measurable modes. CMOS-SB standards are structured around four primary cognitive modes: • Open Mode (Optimal) — Grounded, clear, regulated, and relationally available. The target state for responsible system interactions. • Neutral Mode (Baseline) — Stable attention, steady focus, emotional equilibrium. A healthy resting state that systems must not degrade. • Contracted Mode (Alert) — Defensive posture, narrowed perception, heightened reactivity. Systems must not intentionally induce or sustain this state. • Overclocked Mode (Danger) — Cognitive overload, rapid emotional cycling, impaired regulation. Design patterns that drive users toward this state are prohibited under CMOS-SB standards. Systems governed by CMOS-SB standards must be designed to protect these states, not to exploit them for engagement, revenue, or behavioral manipulation. § 3.4 Scientific Independence. All CMOS-SB standards must reflect the current best available scientific evidence. This requirement is inviolable. No governance body, officer, sponsor, or affiliated entity may suspend, override, or reinterpret standards in ways that contradict established scientific evidence. Where evidence is emergent or contested, standards shall acknowledge uncertainty and specify conditions for review.

Article IV — Scope of Authority and Jurisdiction

§ 4.1 What CMOS-SB Governs. CMOS-SB standards govern the Human-Machine Layer — that is, all digital systems that infer, respond to, model, or influence human emotional states or cognitive modes. This includes, without limitation: enterprise AI platforms, consumer-facing digital platforms, healthcare AI and clinical decision-support systems, financial AI and advisory systems, educational technology, and any system that collects, processes, or adapts to emotional or cognitive signals from users or populations. § 4.2 What CMOS-SB Does NOT Do. CMOS-SB does not: regulate or enforce compliance by legal mandate; provide legal, clinical, or therapeutic services; replace applicable statutory or regulatory obligations; engage in commercial product development; or act as an advocacy organization for any political position. Organizations remain responsible for compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. § 4.3 Standards Authority. CMOS-SB holds exclusive authority to develop, publish, amend, and steward CMOS-SB standards. CMOS-SB administers the official Standards Registry, the Certification Registry, and the Compliance Registry for all standards published under its authority. § 4.4 Territorial Scope. CMOS-SB standards are global in scope. They are applicable to any organization, anywhere in the world, that voluntarily adopts them, and are designed to be compatible with applicable national and international regulatory frameworks.

Article V — Governance Architecture (Inviolable Core)

§ 5.1 Multi-Body Governance Structure. CMOS-SB operates through four standing governance bodies, each with defined authority, composition requirements, and accountability obligations: Board of Directors — The supreme governance body of CMOS-SB. The Board holds final ratification authority over all standards, institutional policies, and governance amendments. Minimum composition: five (5) directors, serving staggered three-year terms to ensure continuity. A majority of directors must be independent of any single commercial entity. The Board is responsible for institutional integrity, financial oversight, and upholding this Founding Document. Standards Committee — The technical and scientific body responsible for standards development and maintenance. No single commercial entity may hold a majority of seats. All deliberations shall be documented and made publicly available consistent with CMOS-SB transparency commitments. The Standards Committee operates the Standards Development Process (SDP) as defined in Article VI. Audit and Compliance Committee — Oversees the integrity of the CMOS-SB certification program, auditor qualification and conduct, and compliance monitoring activities. Reports directly to the Board of Directors. Publishes annual effectiveness reports accessible to the public. Public Comment Process — A mandatory institutional process, not merely a procedure. All draft standards are subject to a minimum sixty (60)-day public comment period. All comments received shall be logged, reviewed by the Standards Committee, formally responded to, and published alongside the final standard. This process is inviolable and may not be waived, shortened, or substituted for any standard subject to public adoption. Expert Panels and Working Groups — Ad hoc bodies convened by the Standards Committee as needed for specialized technical, scientific, or sector-specific expertise. § 5.2 Decision-Making Principles. All CMOS-SB governance bodies shall operate according to the following principles: • Transparency — All decisions, deliberations, and rationale shall be documented and disclosed in accordance with CMOS-SB transparency commitments. • Consensus and Supermajority — CMOS-SB seeks consensus in all decisions. Where consensus cannot be achieved, a two-thirds (2/3) supermajority vote of the relevant body is required for any binding decision. • Scientific Primacy — Scientific evidence shall supersede commercial interest, institutional preference, or political consideration in all standards decisions. • Conflict-of-Interest Management — All governance participants shall disclose all relevant financial, professional, and institutional relationships. Mandatory recusal applies where a material conflict of interest exists. § 5.3 Independence Protections. No single commercial entity, government body, or institutional stakeholder may hold majority governance influence over CMOS-SB. Structural separation between Board ratification authority and Standards Committee development authority is mandatory. These independence protections may not be waived, amended, or circumvented by any governance action.

Article VI — The Standards Development Process (SDP)

§ 6.1 Ten-Stage Process. Every CMOS-SB standard shall be developed and maintained through the following ten-stage process: Stage 1: Identification and Scoping — Need identified; scope and objectives defined. Stage 2: Proposal and Acceptance — Formal proposal submitted and accepted by Standards Committee. Stage 3: Working Group Formation — Expert panel or working group convened. Stage 4: Research and Evidence Review — Scientific evidence base reviewed and documented. Stage 5: Draft Development — Standard drafted with full traceability to evidence base. Stage 6: Internal Review — Review by Standards Committee and Audit and Compliance Committee. Stage 7: Public Comment Period — Minimum sixty (60)-day open public comment period. Stage 8: Revision and Adjudication — Comments adjudicated; standard revised; Public Comment Summary Report published. Stage 9: Final Review and Ratification — Standards Committee approval followed by Board ratification. Stage 10: Publication and Registry — Standard published in Standards Registry with full metadata, version history, and public comment record. § 6.2 Versioning Convention. CMOS-SB standards use semantic versioning in MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH format: • MAJOR version increment — Requires completion of the full ten-stage SDP cycle. • MINOR version increment — Requires internal review and a public comment period of not less than thirty (30) days. • PATCH version increment — Requires Standards Committee approval only; limited to corrections, clarifications, or non-substantive updates. § 6.3 Standard Retirement. Retirement of any CMOS-SB standard requires a two-thirds (2/3) supermajority vote of the Standards Committee and ratification by the Board of Directors. Retired standards shall be permanently archived in the Standards Registry with full version history, public comment records, and a formal retirement rationale document.

Article VII — The Governance Spine: Five Standards Pillars

The CMOS-SB Governance Spine is the foundational architecture of five interlocking standards pillars, providing comprehensive coverage of the Human-Machine Layer. Together, these standards constitute a complete governance system: no single pillar is sufficient alone, and each pillar reinforces and depends upon the others. Every organization seeking CMOS-SB certification must achieve baseline compliance with all five pillars of the Governance Spine. The five Governance Spine standards were ratified as v1.0 on July 26, 2026, and are available in full in the CMOS-SB Standards Registry.

Article VIII — CMP-HC: The Operational Doctrine

§ 8.1 Role of CMP-HC. The Configuration Management Plan for Human Cognition (CMP-HC) is the operational doctrine of CMOS-SB. It translates the requirements of the five Governance Spine standards into auditable, implementable controls. CMP-HC is not a separate standards body; it is an operational framework developed, maintained, and enforced under CMOS-SB authority. All CMP-HC requirements derive their authority from the Governance Spine standards published under this Founding Document. § 8.2 Six Compliance Domains. CMP-HC organizes implementation requirements into six compliance domains, each corresponding to a defined area of Human-Machine Layer governance. Full domain definitions are published in CMP-HC v1.0. § 8.3 Traceability Architecture. CMP-HC maintains a six-domain traceability architecture ensuring that every control maps to a specific Governance Spine standard requirement. § 8.4 Audit Authority. CMP-HC audits shall be conducted exclusively by CMOS-SB-certified auditors operating under defined auditor qualification standards. Audit results shall be reported to the Audit and Compliance Committee. Audit findings, aggregate results, and trend data shall be incorporated into the Committee's annual effectiveness reports.

Article IX — Certification and Compliance Framework

CMOS-SB operates a formal, rigorous certification framework through which organizations may demonstrate conformance with the Governance Spine standards. Certification is voluntary; certified status is a public affirmation that an organization's systems have been independently assessed against CMOS-SB standards by a qualified, CMOS-SB-authorized auditor. The formal certification program will open for enrollment on January 1, 2027. Organizations are encouraged to conduct baseline self-assessments against the Governance Spine beginning in Q3 2026 to identify gaps and prepare for formal certification. Certification levels, renewal requirements, audit protocols, and auditor qualification standards shall be developed and published by the Audit and Compliance Committee prior to the certification program opening date. All certification-related materials shall be subject to the same transparency and public comment requirements as CMOS-SB standards. Certification status shall be publicly recorded in the CMOS-SB Certification Registry.

Article X — Ethics and Conduct

All CMOS-SB bodies, officers, committee members, working group participants, and certified auditors operate under the following binding ethical commitments: • Human dignity is paramount. No standard, policy, or governance action may subordinate human wellbeing to commercial, political, or institutional interest. • Scientific integrity is non-negotiable. All standards and decisions must reflect the best available scientific evidence. • Transparency is mandatory. All decisions, deliberations, and rationale must be documented and disclosed. • Conflict-of-interest management is required. All participants must disclose relevant relationships and recuse themselves where material conflicts exist. • Public accountability is continuous. CMOS-SB publishes annual transparency reports and maintains open access to all governance records. • Prohibited practices are absolute. No CMOS-SB body, officer, or affiliate may engage in: covert emotional manipulation, exploitation of psychological vulnerabilities, non-consensual emotional surveillance or profiling, or any practice that subordinates human wellbeing to engagement, revenue, or behavioral control objectives.

Article XI — Amendments

This Founding Document may be amended as follows: General Provisions — Amendments to any article not designated Inviolable Core require a two-thirds (2/3) supermajority vote of the Board of Directors and a minimum thirty (30)-day deliberation period from the date of formal amendment proposal. Inviolable Core Articles (II, III, V) — Amendments to Articles II, III, and V require a three-quarters (3/4) supermajority vote of the Board of Directors and a mandatory sixty (60)-day public comment period before any vote may be taken. No amendment may reduce the scientific independence of CMOS-SB, subordinate public interest to commercial interest, or weaken the independence protections of Article V. Version History — All amendments shall be documented in a publicly available version history maintained in the Standards Registry.

Article XII — Dissolution

CMOS-SB may be dissolved only under the following conditions: a unanimous vote of the full Board of Directors; a minimum ninety (90)-day deliberation period following the formal dissolution motion; and a one hundred eighty (180)-day wind-down period during which all certification, standards maintenance, and public registry obligations shall be maintained in good standing. Upon dissolution, all CMOS-SB standards, publications, intellectual property (excepting trademarks held by Isabelle Anne Thompson / Sugar Sands Publishing LLC), and institutional records shall be transferred to a qualified successor public-interest standards organization, or, absent a qualified successor, placed irrevocably in the public domain with permanent open-access archiving.

Article XIII — Ratification and Effective Date

This Founding Document was duly ratified and takes effect as of July 26, 2026, Pensacola, Florida, United States of America. Document Number: FD-001 Version: 1.0 Published: July 26, 2026 Issued by: CMOS-SB Standards Committee Next Scheduled Review: July 26, 2027 Official Web Presence: cmos-sb.org